Stenography: Exercise No.6

 Legal Dictation

Learned counsel further submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that main accused used to call him on his mobile phone.

Learned counsel, appearing for petitioner Dashrath Singh, submits that petitioner has been declared a juvenile in conflict with law by the Juvenile Justice Board, vide order dated 01.10.2020 as he was less than 18 years of age.

It is further argued that even from this petitioner, no contraband was recovered and the allegations are that petitioner has given a SIM to one Kuldeep.

Learned State counsel has filed the custody certificate of all the accused/petitioners giving details (100) of judicial custody 5 of 9 in virtual Court undergone by them. It is not disputed that co-accused Rahul @ Gurlal Singh has already been granted concession of regular bail as noticed above.

In reply to arguments, raised on behalf of petitioner Satish Kumar, learned State counsel submits that recovery from the main accused was of commercial quantity and as per disclosure of co-accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli, the petitioner has given Rs. 2 Lakh for supply of poppy husk and he was involved in one more case, however, he stands acquitted in that case and now no case (200) is pending against him except the present FIR.

Learned State counsel, in reply to arguments raised on behalf of petitioner Vinod Kumar, submits that the petitioner has given Rs. 54,000/- in favour of co-accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli to bring poppy husk from another accused Dashrath Singh (a juvenile from Madhya Pradesh).

In reply to argument, raised on behalf of petitioners Lakhwinder Singh @ Lucky and Resham Singh, learned State counsel submits that they are the brothers of co-accused Rahul @ Gurlal Singh and Resham Singh has transferred Rs. 20,000/- in the bank account of co-accused Rakesh and both the (300) petitioners have paid cash amount to main accused.

Learned State counsel, in reply to arguments raised on behalf of Nazeem Khan, could not dispute that he is a juvenile in conflict with law, however, submits the Board has 6 of 9 In virtual Court rightly formed an opinion that if he is released on bail, there is a likelihood that he may be exposed to moral, physical and psychological danger as it has come in the report of special investigation that he was influenced by his friends to indulge in this business and being a resident of Madhya Pradesh, he may flee away from the justice. (408)

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.

Stenography: Most important Legal Phrases

 

LEGAL PHRASES

1.      According to the                 ____________	2.      According to the evidence _______
3.       According to the evidence adduced                                 ____________	4.      According to the evidence adduced in the case            _______
5.      According to the evidence discussed                               ____________	6.      According the evidence discussed above                   ______
7.      According to the information supplied                                 _____________	8.      Accused was charged with having                                    _____
9.       Accused was charged with having committed an offence          _____________	10.  Accused was charged with having committed an offence punishable under section    _____
11.   Accused was charged with having committed an offence under section                        _____________	12.   Accused was found         ______
13.  Accused was found guilty     _____________	14.  Accused was not found guilty    ____
15.  Ad interim information     _____________	16.  Add these to the list                  ____
17.  Additional First Class Magistrate                        _____________	18.  Additional Magistrate               ___
19.  Additional Second Class Magistrate                        _____________	20.  Adjudged an insolvent              ___
21.  After hearing both sides   _____________	22.  After hearing the arguments _____
23.  After hearing the arguments of the defence counsel _______________	24.  After hearing the arguments of the prosecution counsel    _____
25.  Alleged by the defendant _____________	26.  Alleged by the petitioner          ____
27.  Alleged by the plaintiff    ______________	28.  Alleged by the prosecution      ____
29.  Alleged by the respondent   ____________	30.  Alleged to have been              _____
31.  Alleged to have committed   ____________	32.  Alleged to have committed an offence                               ______
33.  Alleged to have committed an offence punishable under section _________	34.  Alleged to have committed an offence under section           _______
35.  Alleged to have been entered into   ________	36.  Alleged to have been found   _____
37.  Alleged to have found        _______________	38.  Allowed the application   ________

Stenography Exercise No.5

 Legal Dictation 450 words.

Learned counsel further submits that similarly situated co-accused, namely Rahul @ Gurlal Singh, who was also nominated on the disclosure statement of accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli and Vipin, has already been granted concession of regular bail, vide order dated 18.02.2021 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench in CRM- M-34192-2020 noticing the fact that the challan has been presented and no narcotic substance was recovered from him and the only evidence against him is the disclosure statement of the co-accused.

Learned counsel, appearing for petitioner Vinod Kumar, 3 of 9 In virtual Court submits that after his name surfaced (100)  in the disclosure statement of aforesaid two co-accused, the petitioner was arrested, however, nothing was recovered from him. Learned counsel further submits that even during investigation, the police has taken the details of the bank account and nothing was found showing that any transaction has taken place from the bank account of the petitioner.

It is further submitted that the petitioner is a chronic eye patient and is taking treatment of his right eye, for which, he has already been operated due to loss of eye sight.

Learned counsel further argues that petitioner is in judicial custody for the last (200) about 11 months and though he was previously convicted for possessing small quantity of contraband in the year 2010, however, except that he is not involved in any other case.

Learned counsel, appearing for petitioners Lakhwinder Singh @ Lucky and Resham Singh, submits that petitioners are the brothers of co-accused Rahul @ Gurlal Singh, who has already been granted concession of regular as noticed above. It is further submitted that the case of the petitioners are on the similar footing to that of co-accused Rahul @ Gurlal Singh as he was also nominated on the disclosure of co-accused.

Learned counsel (300) further submits that the petitioners are carrying on their separate business in Gujarat and have no antecedents of involvement in any other case.

4 of 9 In virtual Court Learned counsel, appearing for petitioner Nazeem Khan, argues that the petitioner is a juvenile in conflict with law, aged about 15 years, and was a student of 7th Standard at the time when he was arrested.

Learned counsel further submits that except the disclosure of co-accused, there is nothing on record to suggest that petitioner played any active role. It is further submitted that Juvenile Justice Board as well as Additional (400) Sessions Judge have wrongly declined the concession of regular bail to the petitioner as the maximum punishment under the Act is three years and the petitioner has already undergone custody of about 01 year and 01 month and he is not involved in any other case. (450)

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.

Stenography Exercise No.4

 Legal Dictation

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, relies upon the order dated 06.07.2021 passed in CRM-M-41104-2020, vide which four co-accused of the petitioner namely Satish Kumar, Vinod Kumar, Lakhwinder Singh and Dashrath Singh have been granted the concession of regular bail.

Brief facts of the case are that the FIR was registered at the instance of Ram Kumar, ASI STF Unit, Ambala while sending information under Section 41 of the NDPS Act that the police party, headed by him, has received a secret information that co-accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli and Vipin are indulged in the business (100) of narcotics and they are coming in a truck bearing registration number HR-64-5638 and they can be apprehended by putting a barrier on the bridge. After sending the information, the police registered the FIR and apprehended both the accused. On search of the vehicle, 876 Kgs. of poppy straw/husk was recovered and both of them were arrested. During investigation, these accused suffered disclosure statements naming as many as 09 more persons as accused.

Arguments Learned counsel, appearing for petitioner Satish Kumar, submits that when co-accused were arrested on 26.05.2020 and on the next date, they recorded their disclosure statement that (200) they had brought poppy husk from Madhya Pradesh and had to supply the same to one Jain r/o Nirwana, Vinod r/o Cheeka, Suresh and his brother r/o village Karodan.

Learned counsel further submits that thereafter, the police recorded the second disclosure of accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli, in which the name of the petitioner figured as a person, who was 2 of 9 In virtual Court to receive some amount of the poppy husk and thereafter, the petitioner was arrested on 25.06.2020, however, no narcotic was recovered from him. It is further submitted that in pursuance to second disclosure, suffered (300) by accused Sarvjit Singh @ Sabli, no evidence has come forward to corroborated the same.

Learned counsel further submits that as per this disclosure, one Yusuf Khan and Arif @ Pappu were said to be the supplier of the poppy husk and later on, they were also nominated and arrested.

It is further submitted that till date, charges have not been framed and total 49 prosecution witnesses are cited and the petitioner was granted interim bail for three days for attending the marriage of his sister and after availing the same, he has surrendered back and has not misused the same. (400)

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.

Stenography Exercise No.3

 Legal Dictation 

Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, while intervening in this debate, I would like to thank the hon’ble Members who have contributed to this debate. Each and everyone has given words of praise for our Armed Forces. They have supported us. Not only they supported us but they have urged that Government should provide more funds for the Defence Forces.

            As regards the Parliamentary Committee which has been mentioned by some Members, there was a recommendation, but it has not been accepted nor has it been rejected. We have started certain schemes and started implementation of these recommendations. Once these recommendations are (100) implemented and once we have the feedback then we would like to consider whether a Parliamentary Committee is at all necessary. But we can say, at this stage, that the Government has neither rejected nor accepted the formulation of the Parliamentary Committee.

            A mention has been made that Army should not be deployed time and again for the civilian aids. It is always the policy of the Government, so also of the Defence Ministry, that we never encourage it unless it is absolutely necessary. The Army has played a very good role in helping the civilian administration when they are (200) called for at the time of natural calamities and for combating terrorist activities in various parts of the country. They have maintained unfortunately, there are some criticisms when Army has been deployed in Manipur and Tripura. And I can tell that the  Army has never involved itself in any activity other than those which they have been assigned for that is, countering the insurgency. We have seen that insurgency in Nagaland has been stopped. We have seen that after the Army was inducted in Tripura, peace has not only come but the killings have been stopped. (300) This is a good sign. Army has been assigned with the particular job and they are doing it. Not only that, when Army goes to different remote areas, they take certain steps to develop better contact with the people. In Tripura, I myself have seen that the Army has taken medical team along with their combat team, and they have given medical aid to the people of that area. In addition to this, they have organized various activities there through distribution of food-stuffs among the children and they have also given nourishing food to the children. (400)

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.

Stenography Exercise No.2

 Please like, share and follow my YouTube channel Shorthand Lovers. 

Legal Dictation 

The petitioner has approached this High Court under section 439 Cr.P.C. along with Section 482 Cr. P.C being aggrieved against the order 11.6.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar by which the application for default bail has been dismissed.

From the aforesaid sub-sections, it is apparent that normally, the investigating officer is required to produce all the relevant documents at the time of submitting the charge-sheet. At the same time, as there is no specific prohibition, it cannot be held that the additional documents cannot be produced subsequently. If some mistake is committed in not producing the relevant documents (100) at the time of submitting the report or the charge-sheet, it is always open to the investigating officer to produce the same with the permission of the court. In our view, considering the preliminary stage of prosecution and the context in which the police officer is required to forward to the Magistrate all the documents or the relevant extracts thereof on which the prosecution proposes to rely, the word "shall" used in sub-section (5) cannot be interpreted as mandatory, but as directory. Normally, the documents 4 of 7 gathered during the investigation upon which the prosecution wants to rely are (200) required to be forwarded to the Magistrate, but if there is some omission, it would not mean that the remaining documents cannot be produced subsequently. 

The ratio as settled in Central Bureau of Investigation v. R.S. Pai & Anr., (supra) was subsequently followed in Narinder Kumar Amin case where it was reiterated that the word "shall" used in sub-Section (5) cannot be interpreted as mandatory, but directory in nature. In that case too Police filed charge-sheet within 90 days but all documents were not attached. It was held that if the report filed before the Court satisfies all the requirements (300) of Section 173(2) then it is sufficient compliance of filing a report. Whereas in the Fakrey Alam Case the charge sheet itself was filed after a period of 180 days had expired, and that too after the application for default bail had been filed. Therefore, the distinguishing factor is that in Fakrey Alam's case the charge sheet was filed after the stipulated period of 90 days whereas in the instant case the charge sheet was filed but without the cyber cell report annexed relating to the uploading of objectionable photos. Consequently, the instant petition stands dismissed. (400)

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.

Video for dictation.

Stenography Exercise-1 (80 wpm ENG)

Please like, share and follow my YouTube channel Shorthand Lovers. 

Legal Dictation  

The appellant herein has alleged that he was married according to the Hindu Customary Rites with one Lakshmi on 25.6.1980. Out of the wedlock with Lakshmi a male child was born, who is now studying in an Engineering college at Ooty. The petitioner is working as a Secondary Teacher in Thevanga Higher Secondary School, Coimbatore.

It appears that the respondent-D. Patchaiammal filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in the year 2001 before the Family Court at Coimbatore in which she alleged that she was married to the appellant herein on 14.9.1986 and since then the appellant herein and she (100) lived together in her father's house for two or three years. It is alleged in the petition that after two or three years the appellant herein left the house of the respondent's father and started living in his native place, but would visit the respondent occasionally.

It is alleged that the appellant herein (respondent in the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C.) deserted the respondent herein (petitioner in the proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C.) two or three years after marrying her in 1986. In her petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. she alleged that she did not have any kind of (200) livelihood and she is unable to maintain herself whereas the respondent (appellant herein) is a Secondary Grade Teacher drawing a salary of Rs.10000/- per month. Hence it was prayed that the respondent (appellant herein) be directed to pay Rs.500/- per month as maintenance to the petitioner.

In both her petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. as well as in her deposition in the case the respondent has alleged that she was married to the appellant herein on 14.9.1986, and that he left her after two or three years of living together with her in her father's house.

Thus it is the (300) own case of the respondent herein that the appellant left her in 1988 or 1989 (i.e. two or three years after the alleged marriage in 1986). Why then was the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed in the year 2001, i.e. after a delay of about twelve years, shall have to be satisfactorily explained by the respondent. This fact also creates some doubt about the case of the respondent herein.

It may be noted that Section 125 Cr.P.C. provides for giving maintenance to the wife and some other relatives. The word `wife' has been defined in Explanation (b) to Section 125(1). (400)

 

if you see video please click on this.

Stenography Exercise No.1 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.2 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.3 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.4 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.5 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.6 CLICK HERE.
Stenography Exercise No.7 CLICK HERE.